2026ArbitrationHigh CourtInsolvencyLatestLegal

Liquidator’s Arbitral Notice does not perish for want of NCLT prior approval

The petitioner liquidator of the company has invoked clause 17 arbitration clause of the Purchase Order for appointment of arbitrator.

The liquidator issued section 21 arbitration notice on 10.3.2022 and NCLT granted post facto approval under Section 33(5) of the IBC for arbitration.

(i) Whether proviso to Section 33(5) of the IBC is mandatory i.e. prior approval of the Adjudicating Authority is mandatory to institute any legal proceedings on behalf of the corporate debtor? (ii) If prior approval is mandatory, what is the effect of post facto approval by the Adjudicating Authority on proceedings already instituted without approval of the Authority?

This Court is, therefore, of the view that while prior permission under Section 33(5) is mandatory, the absence of such prior permission before the initiation of the legal proceedings, does not render the proceedings void ab initio. Instead, the commencement of such proceedings remains ineffective until the date on which the required permission is granted by the Adjudicating Authority.

Accordingly, in the present case, the notice issued for invocation of arbitration under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act would become effective only from the date on which permission under Section 33(5) is obtained. Any further steps in the proceedings can be taken only thereafter. Relegating the parties to issue a fresh notice would not serve the purpose of the proviso to Section 33(5), as it may also create issues relating to limitation on account of the time lost during the intervening period. A purposive interpretation of Section 33(5) requires that proceedings initiated without prior permission remain ineffective for all purposes until such permission is obtained, and that the proceedings shall be treated as having commenced from the date of grant of permission.

Judgment dated 22.7.2026 of the High Court of Bombay in Commercial Arbitration Application No.245 of 2026 of Teepro Systems Limited (In Liquidation)  Vs.  Reliance Infrastructure Limited

Arbitration invoked by the Liquidator before obtaining prior approval of NCLT under Section 33(5) of IBC is not necessarily void ab initio but once the NCLT granted approval, the defect stands cured and the arbitration process can validly proceed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I HAVE READ THE DISCLAIMER AND AGREE TO IT.

User Acknowledgement

By proceeding further and clicking on the "AGREE" button herein below, I acknowledge that I of my own accord wish to know more about LegalDeli for my own information and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from LegalDeli or any of its members to create an Attorney-Client relationship through this knowledge site. I further acknowledge having read and understood the Disclaimer below.

Disclaimer
About: This knowledge-site (www.LegalDeli.in) is owned and operated by LegalDeli (“LD”), and is a resource for your informational and educational purposes only.

No Warranty: LD does not warrant that any content or information contained on this knowledge-site is accurate, correct, complete or up-to-date, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any actual or threatened loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or otherwise. LD assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the content and/or information contained on this knowledge-site, nor does it offer any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied in relation to such content or information.

Third-Party Links: LD does not intend that links / URLs contained on this knowledge-site re-directing users to third party websites be considered as referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with any such third party website operators. LD is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the content or information contained on such third party websites to which links may be provided on this knowledge-site.

No Legal Advice: By clicking ‘I agree’ and proceeding further, you acknowledge, represent and undertake that you on your own accord wish to know more about LD, its capabilities and research content and information contained on the knowledge-site, for your own knowledge and personal use. The content and information contained on this knowledge-site should not be construed as nor relied upon as legal advice. You as a reader or recipient of content or information contained in this knowledge-site should not act, nor refrain from acting, based upon any or all of such content or information, but should always seek the advice of competent legal counsel licensed to practice the relevant law in the appropriate jurisdiction.

No Attorney-Client Relationship: This knowledge-site is not intended to be and you should not consider the content or information contained therein to be an advertisement, solicitation, inducement or invitation for an Attorney-Client relationship. Transmission, receipt or use of this knowledge-site, including content and information contained therein, does not constitute nor create an Attorney-Client relationship between LD and you.