2026High CourtLatestLegalService Law

Employer’s Pay Fixation Error Cannot Burden Retired Class III Employee of University

Judgment dated 11.9.2026 of the High Court of Bombay in Writ Petition No.14168 of 2024 of Shrinivas Ganesh Kuokarni  Vs.  Savitribai Phule Pune University and others.

On 7.6.1993, the petitioner was appointed as Data Entry Operator in the respondent no.1 SP Pune University.  On 26.9.1994, the fresh appointment on permanent basis was issued. 

On 31.12.2022, the petitioner had retired from the service of the University due to superannuation.

The petitioner Class III Employee has challenged the notice dated 17.4.2023 of the University for recovery of Rs.39,94,343/- as excess payment on account of error in pay fixation.

The petitioner was not paid post retiral benefits such as gratuity, earned leave encashment, arrears of 7th pay commission and accrued interest of Provident Fund amount.

We are also of the view that the letter dated 17th April 2023 in the present case seeking to recover the alleged excess amount from the Petitioner has been issued post the retirement of the Petitioner, i.e., on 31st December 2022. This, to our mind, also strengthens the case of the Petitioner that an amount which has already been paid to the Petitioner cannot now be recovered from the Petitioner on the ground of a mistake on the part of the employer. Further, it is not disputed before us that the Petitioner is a Class III employee, and hence the decisions in Rafiq Masih (supra) and Anil Pralhad Dhande (supra) would completely cover the facts of the present case. Even otherwise for recovery of such amounts even a civil suit was hopelessly time barred.

Considering the aforesaid factual and legal backdrop, we are of the opinion that it would be illegal and arbitrary to recover the amount of Rs.39,94,343/- from the Petitioner’s retiral benefits, more so when the Petitioner is a Class III employee. In view thereof, we are of the view that this Writ Petition deserves to succeed, and the illegal recovery made by Respondent No. 1-University deserves to be set aside. We therefore pass the following order which will meet the ends of justice.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I HAVE READ THE DISCLAIMER AND AGREE TO IT.

User Acknowledgement

By proceeding further and clicking on the "AGREE" button herein below, I acknowledge that I of my own accord wish to know more about LegalDeli for my own information and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from LegalDeli or any of its members to create an Attorney-Client relationship through this knowledge site. I further acknowledge having read and understood the Disclaimer below.

Disclaimer
About: This knowledge-site (www.LegalDeli.in) is owned and operated by LegalDeli (“LD”), and is a resource for your informational and educational purposes only.

No Warranty: LD does not warrant that any content or information contained on this knowledge-site is accurate, correct, complete or up-to-date, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any actual or threatened loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or otherwise. LD assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the content and/or information contained on this knowledge-site, nor does it offer any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied in relation to such content or information.

Third-Party Links: LD does not intend that links / URLs contained on this knowledge-site re-directing users to third party websites be considered as referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with any such third party website operators. LD is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the content or information contained on such third party websites to which links may be provided on this knowledge-site.

No Legal Advice: By clicking ‘I agree’ and proceeding further, you acknowledge, represent and undertake that you on your own accord wish to know more about LD, its capabilities and research content and information contained on the knowledge-site, for your own knowledge and personal use. The content and information contained on this knowledge-site should not be construed as nor relied upon as legal advice. You as a reader or recipient of content or information contained in this knowledge-site should not act, nor refrain from acting, based upon any or all of such content or information, but should always seek the advice of competent legal counsel licensed to practice the relevant law in the appropriate jurisdiction.

No Attorney-Client Relationship: This knowledge-site is not intended to be and you should not consider the content or information contained therein to be an advertisement, solicitation, inducement or invitation for an Attorney-Client relationship. Transmission, receipt or use of this knowledge-site, including content and information contained therein, does not constitute nor create an Attorney-Client relationship between LD and you.