Sunday, November 8, 2026
Latest:
2026High CourtLatestLegalReal EstateRERA

Revenue Recovery Officer of UP RERA – Powers, Authority & Jurisdiction

legaldeli

the judgment dated 30.10.2026 of the  High Court of Allahabad at Lucknow in Matters under Article 227 No.5621 of 2026 of Tulsani Constructions and Developers Pvt Ltd.  Vs.  State of U.P. and others with connected writ petitions.

The issue involved in the aforesaid petitions relates to the jurisdiction and validity of the order passed by the Revenue Recovery Officer, Real Estate Regulatory Authority (hereinafter referred to as ‘RERA’) in respect of an application moved by the petitioner seeking correction in the recovery certificate issued by RERA, which was primarily relatable to the calculation/recalculation of the amount impacting the interest component entered in the recovery certificate.

the home buyers had certain grievances with the petitioner company and they raised it by invoking the jurisdiction of RERA by making their complaints. RERA, by means of its judgment and order dated 23.05.2022, directed the petitioner company to provide the possession of the unit, the subject matter of the home-buyer agreement, after completing the formalities within a period of 45 days, and for the delayed period, the petitioner was also required to pay interest from the date mentioned in the agreement for providing the possession till the date of actual handing over possession, along with interest which would be 1% higher to the MCLR as determined by the State Bank. 13. In furtherance of the said order dated 23.05.2022, a recovery certificate was issued dated 08.07.2025. Since the payment was not made in pursuance of the order dated 23.05.2022, hence, the home buyers moved an application to the RERA seeking compliance of its order. 14. It is at this stage that the petitioner company moved an application for rectification of the recovery certificate. As per the petitioner company, the period for which interest was mentioned and calculated and indicated in the recovery certificate was incorrect, hence it required the RERA to recall/recalculate/rectify the recovery certificate. Since the application moved by the petitioner was engaging the attention of the RERA authorities

You May Also Like

Section 80P of Income Tax Act 1961 – Deduction – Cooperative Society for profits arising out of credit given to its members

legaldeli

Dividend Income – Tax Credit to Joint Venture – Oman Tax Laws and Double Taxation Avoidance Treaty

legaldeli

LMV Driving Licence & Transport Vehicle – Review of 2017 Judgment of the Supreme Court to consider consequences and social issues

legaldeli

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I HAVE READ THE DISCLAIMER AND AGREE TO IT.

User Acknowledgement

By proceeding further and clicking on the "AGREE" button herein below, I acknowledge that I of my own accord wish to know more about LegalDeli for my own information and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from LegalDeli or any of its members to create an Attorney-Client relationship through this knowledge site. I further acknowledge having read and understood the Disclaimer below.

Disclaimer
About: This knowledge-site (www.LegalDeli.in) is owned and operated by LegalDeli (“LD”), and is a resource for your informational and educational purposes only.

No Warranty: LD does not warrant that any content or information contained on this knowledge-site is accurate, correct, complete or up-to-date, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any actual or threatened loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or otherwise. LD assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the content and/or information contained on this knowledge-site, nor does it offer any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied in relation to such content or information.

Third-Party Links: LD does not intend that links / URLs contained on this knowledge-site re-directing users to third party websites be considered as referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with any such third party website operators. LD is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the content or information contained on such third party websites to which links may be provided on this knowledge-site.

No Legal Advice: By clicking ‘I agree’ and proceeding further, you acknowledge, represent and undertake that you on your own accord wish to know more about LD, its capabilities and research content and information contained on the knowledge-site, for your own knowledge and personal use. The content and information contained on this knowledge-site should not be construed as nor relied upon as legal advice. You as a reader or recipient of content or information contained in this knowledge-site should not act, nor refrain from acting, based upon any or all of such content or information, but should always seek the advice of competent legal counsel licensed to practice the relevant law in the appropriate jurisdiction.

No Attorney-Client Relationship: This knowledge-site is not intended to be and you should not consider the content or information contained therein to be an advertisement, solicitation, inducement or invitation for an Attorney-Client relationship. Transmission, receipt or use of this knowledge-site, including content and information contained therein, does not constitute nor create an Attorney-Client relationship between LD and you.

I Agree