LatestLegalSeptember 2023

Section 7 of IBC – Interplay of Sections 5 & 18 of the Limitation Act for counting period of limitation.

Interplay of Section 7 of IBC & Sections 5 & 18 of the Limitation Act for counting period of limitation in the light of facts of the case

Leave and Licence Agreement between the appellant – Axis Bank and the Universal Premises & Textiles Pvt Ltd for ground to 10th floors in Solaris C building.   Security deposit of Rs.87,56,24,381/- was given by the appellant between the period of 23.6.2007 to 3.11.2008.   Universal Premises executed simple mortgage of seven floors without possession in favour of the appellant on 6.11.2008.

On 2.5.20211, Universal Premises executed sale-deed in favour of Rajput Retail Ltd for the land of 5123.90 sq.fts including the land underneath building Solaris C also.    Leave and licence was acknowledge, reserved and protected under the sale-deed.

On 29.6.20211, RPL created equitable mortgage of the land underneath in favour of SBI for credit facilities.

ON 28.6.2013, SBI declared CD as NPA.

In 2021, Universal Premises merged with RPIL and renamed as Shreem Corporation Limited (Corporate Debtor).

The appellant filed eight summary suits for refund of security deposit under Leave and Licence Agreement on failure to return the same inspite of demand notices.

On 22.1.2020, the respondent no.2 filed section 7 IBC application against the Corporate Debtor and also section 5 application under the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 1392 days. However, the respondent no.2 filed additional affidavit that the delay was 662 days since its debt was acknowledged in the Balance Sheet of 2021 by the Corporate Debtor.   Moreover, the appellant was neither intimated of the said proceedings nor was made party to the same.

On 22.9.2021, the NCLT condoned the delay, admitted the IBC petition and appointed Interim Resolution Professional.

The NCLAT dismissed the appeal of the appellant  vide Order dated 4.1.2022.   As a result, the appellant filed the civil appeal in the  Supreme Court.

HELD -SBI declared the CD as NPA on 28.6.2013 and therefore, limitation period would be three years from 31.3.2013 upto 31.3.2016 if there were no intervening circumstances during the said period.  However, in the Balance Sheet of 201-15 ending with 31.3.2015, the CD had acknowledged debt of SBI which is valid for the benefit of Section 18 of the Limitation Act.   Thus, the period of limitation would start from 31.3.2015 upto 31.3.2018.  Secondly, the OTS proposals were made within three years of the said period.

Judgment dated 12.9.2023 in Civil Appeal No.2085 of 2022 – Axis Bank Limited Vs. Naren Sheth and another

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I HAVE READ THE DISCLAIMER AND AGREE TO IT.

User Acknowledgement

By proceeding further and clicking on the "AGREE" button herein below, I acknowledge that I of my own accord wish to know more about LegalDeli for my own information and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from LegalDeli or any of its members to create an Attorney-Client relationship through this knowledge site. I further acknowledge having read and understood the Disclaimer below.

Disclaimer
About: This knowledge-site (www.LegalDeli.in) is owned and operated by LegalDeli (“NDA”), and is a resource for your informational and educational purposes only.

No Warranty: NDA does not warrant that any content or information contained on this knowledge-site is accurate, correct, complete or up-to-date, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any actual or threatened loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or otherwise. NDA assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the content and/or information contained on this knowledge-site, nor does it offer any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied in relation to such content or information.

Third-Party Links: NDA does not intend that links / URLs contained on this knowledge-site re-directing users to third party websites be considered as referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with any such third party website operators. NDA is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the content or information contained on such third party websites to which links may be provided on this knowledge-site.

No Legal Advice: By clicking ‘I agree’ and proceeding further, you acknowledge, represent and undertake that you on your own accord wish to know more about NDA, its capabilities and research content and information contained on the knowledge-site, for your own knowledge and personal use. The content and information contained on this knowledge-site should not be construed as nor relied upon as legal advice. You as a reader or recipient of content or information contained in this knowledge-site should not act, nor refrain from acting, based upon any or all of such content or information, but should always seek the advice of competent legal counsel licensed to practice the relevant law in the appropriate jurisdiction.

No Attorney-Client Relationship: This knowledge-site is not intended to be and you should not consider the content or information contained therein to be an advertisement, solicitation, inducement or invitation for an Attorney-Client relationship. Transmission, receipt or use of this knowledge-site, including content and information contained therein, does not constitute nor create an Attorney-Client relationship between NDA and you.