2025ArbitrationHigh CourtLatestLegalNovember 2025

Milton JV AAward Quashed for Perversity by Bombay HC

Judgment dated 3.11.2025 of the High Court of Bombay in Arbitration Petition No.544 of 2018 (OS) of Rakesh S. Kathotia Vs. Milton Global & others with connected petitions.

Arbitral Award dated 23.12.2017 and the additional Award dated 16.2.2018 are in respect of the disputes of equally owned joint venture of Milton JV between the claimants and the respondents.

 

The Arbitrator treated the rights in JV agreement as obligations and held that Subhkam group has not demonstrated its readiness and willingness to perform such (perceived) obligations.  It was held that specific relief as also damages against violation of non-compete obligations by Vaghani group could not be granted.

Subhakm Group and Vaghani Groups held 50% each in the equity share capital of Milton JV vide agreement dated 13.9.2000 as amended and restated in agreement dated 14.7.2001.

However, Vaghani group diverted the business to its company Hamilton Houseware Pvt.Ltd.  As a result, the turn of Milton was eroded from Rs.30.85 crores in 2004 to Rs.71,000/- in 2013.

HELD that the Arbitral Tribunal held in favour of Subhkam Group on every count but it was further held that the said Group could not be said to have been ready and willing to perform the JVA after 2004 and therefore, it was not entitled to any relief.

JVA – Rights Vs Obligations – Arbitral Award

Every right of an investor to participate in the management and governance of a JV company being converted into an obligation to participate is ex facie unreasonable.   The impugned Award is riddled with inherent contradictions.

Justice Deliver Subversion turns out Irrelevant

The impugned Arbitral Award, regrettably falls in the realm of being in conflict with the most basic notions of justice and morality, apart from being perverse by reason of being riddled with inherent contradictions, leading to an implausible outcome.

By treating a right as an obligation, the impugned award is also contrary to the contract.  This is exacerbated by the finding that the JVA indeed subsists and has not been abandoned.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I HAVE READ THE DISCLAIMER AND AGREE TO IT.

User Acknowledgement

By proceeding further and clicking on the "AGREE" button herein below, I acknowledge that I of my own accord wish to know more about LegalDeli for my own information and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from LegalDeli or any of its members to create an Attorney-Client relationship through this knowledge site. I further acknowledge having read and understood the Disclaimer below.

Disclaimer
About: This knowledge-site (www.LegalDeli.in) is owned and operated by LegalDeli (“NDA”), and is a resource for your informational and educational purposes only.

No Warranty: NDA does not warrant that any content or information contained on this knowledge-site is accurate, correct, complete or up-to-date, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any actual or threatened loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or otherwise. NDA assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the content and/or information contained on this knowledge-site, nor does it offer any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied in relation to such content or information.

Third-Party Links: NDA does not intend that links / URLs contained on this knowledge-site re-directing users to third party websites be considered as referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with any such third party website operators. NDA is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the content or information contained on such third party websites to which links may be provided on this knowledge-site.

No Legal Advice: By clicking ‘I agree’ and proceeding further, you acknowledge, represent and undertake that you on your own accord wish to know more about NDA, its capabilities and research content and information contained on the knowledge-site, for your own knowledge and personal use. The content and information contained on this knowledge-site should not be construed as nor relied upon as legal advice. You as a reader or recipient of content or information contained in this knowledge-site should not act, nor refrain from acting, based upon any or all of such content or information, but should always seek the advice of competent legal counsel licensed to practice the relevant law in the appropriate jurisdiction.

No Attorney-Client Relationship: This knowledge-site is not intended to be and you should not consider the content or information contained therein to be an advertisement, solicitation, inducement or invitation for an Attorney-Client relationship. Transmission, receipt or use of this knowledge-site, including content and information contained therein, does not constitute nor create an Attorney-Client relationship between NDA and you.