Arbitration

Condonation of delay in filing application under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act beyond 120 days

 Section 34 of the Arbitration Act – Delay in filing application – Condonation of delay – Trial Court was closed for vacation on 24.12.2016 when the extended period of 30 days as per proviso to Section 34(3) had expired.  Section 34 application with condonation of delay application was filed on 2.1.2017 on reopening of the trial Court – Important question whether the delay is condonable when the last day of condonable period of 30 days falls on holiday or during court vacation – 

On 24.8.2016 the Arbitral Award was passed against the appellant.  The period of initial 90 days for filing application under Section 34 of AA to challenge the Award expired on 24.11.2016 and further extended period of 30 days was upto 24.12.2016. 

The trial Courts were closed for vacation from 19.12.2016 to 1.1.2017.

On 2.1.2017 of reopening of the trial Court, the application under Section 34 of AA challenging the Award accompanied by the application for condonation of delay was filed.

The trial Court, however, rejected the application for condonation of delay on the ground that the period  beyond 120 days counted from 24.8.2016 was not condonable. 

This was challenged in the High Court.   The appellant filed affidavit in the High Court that although it had received the copy of the award on 24.8.2016, it was misplaced and thereafter, fresh copy was obtained on 29.12.2016. However, the High Court dismissed the appeal.

HELD – On consideration of the contentions of the parties with reference to the Section 34(3) of the Arbitration Act, Section 4 of the Limitation and Section 10 of the General Clauses Act and applying its earlier decision in Assam Urban case (2012(2) SCC 624, it was held that the benefit of exclusion of period during which the Court is closed shall be available when application for setting aside award is filed within “prescribed period of limitation”.     It was also held that the decision in Sridevi Datia Vs. Union of India (2021) (5) SCC 321 did not notice the decision in Assam Urban case.   It was held that the application for setting aside award has to be made within three months prescribed under Section 34(3) and a further period of 30 days if sufficient cause is shown but not thereafter.    The Civil Appeal was dismissed.  

Civil Appeal No.6810 of 2022 – Bhimashankar Sahakri Sakkare Karkhane Niyamita Vs. Walchandnagar Industries Ltd (WIL)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I HAVE READ THE DISCLAIMER AND AGREE TO IT.

User Acknowledgement

By proceeding further and clicking on the "AGREE" button herein below, I acknowledge that I of my own accord wish to know more about LegalDeli for my own information and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from LegalDeli or any of its members to create an Attorney-Client relationship through this knowledge site. I further acknowledge having read and understood the Disclaimer below.

Disclaimer
About: This knowledge-site (www.LegalDeli.in) is owned and operated by LegalDeli (“NDA”), and is a resource for your informational and educational purposes only.

No Warranty: NDA does not warrant that any content or information contained on this knowledge-site is accurate, correct, complete or up-to-date, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any actual or threatened loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or otherwise. NDA assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the content and/or information contained on this knowledge-site, nor does it offer any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied in relation to such content or information.

Third-Party Links: NDA does not intend that links / URLs contained on this knowledge-site re-directing users to third party websites be considered as referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with any such third party website operators. NDA is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the content or information contained on such third party websites to which links may be provided on this knowledge-site.

No Legal Advice: By clicking ‘I agree’ and proceeding further, you acknowledge, represent and undertake that you on your own accord wish to know more about NDA, its capabilities and research content and information contained on the knowledge-site, for your own knowledge and personal use. The content and information contained on this knowledge-site should not be construed as nor relied upon as legal advice. You as a reader or recipient of content or information contained in this knowledge-site should not act, nor refrain from acting, based upon any or all of such content or information, but should always seek the advice of competent legal counsel licensed to practice the relevant law in the appropriate jurisdiction.

No Attorney-Client Relationship: This knowledge-site is not intended to be and you should not consider the content or information contained therein to be an advertisement, solicitation, inducement or invitation for an Attorney-Client relationship. Transmission, receipt or use of this knowledge-site, including content and information contained therein, does not constitute nor create an Attorney-Client relationship between NDA and you.