2026ArbitrationHigh CourtLatestLegalMarch 2026

Delhi HC on CA Certificates Vs Proof of Expenditure in arbitration

The dispute arose out of the contract of construction of various reservoirs.  The respondent had consortium agreement with two other companies.  The respondent was the Consortium Leader.

The Arbitral Tribunal allowed majority of the claims and rejected claims No.3, 6A, 7, 11 and 14.

Section 34 Court confirmed the Award and dismissed the petition.

In Section 37 appeal, mainly two issues were considered – whether award on financing charges is contrary to the contractual provisions and whether the allowed claims were barred by limitation.

Claims 12A and 12B are in respect of additional expenditure & alleged loss of office site / overheads and profits, both during prolongation period due to project delay.

Claim 12A was appended as Annexure 12A to the Statement of Claims and authenticated by the CA.  On that basis, the claim was allowed.

CA certificate cannot be treated as proof of expenditure.  In that context, it was held that the grant of compensation in the absence of proof of actual expenditure amounts to reliance on “no evidence” and therefore, squarely attracts the ground of patent illegality.

Claim 12B for loss of office site / head of office overheads & profits was supported only by the statements of Annexures 12B and 12C.

The award proceeds on an erroneous assumption that financing charges were recoverable as matter of course, despite the absence of any express contractual provision permitting such recovery in the circumstances obtaining in the present case. By treating such charges as a natural or consequential component of compensation, the learned Arbitral Tribunal has, in effect, re-written the commercial bargain between the parties, which is impermissible in law. Further, the learned Single Judge, despite recording that financing charges were payable only in respect of admitted or certified amounts, erred in upholding the award of such charges.

Comments on the post of Anjasi Shah and the Judgment dated 12.1.2026 of the High Court of Delhi in FAO (OS) (COMM) 210/2022 of Delhi Jal Board  Vs.  M/s Mohini Electricals Ltd

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I HAVE READ THE DISCLAIMER AND AGREE TO IT.

User Acknowledgement

By proceeding further and clicking on the "AGREE" button herein below, I acknowledge that I of my own accord wish to know more about LegalDeli for my own information and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from LegalDeli or any of its members to create an Attorney-Client relationship through this knowledge site. I further acknowledge having read and understood the Disclaimer below.

Disclaimer
About: This knowledge-site (www.LegalDeli.in) is owned and operated by LegalDeli (“NDA”), and is a resource for your informational and educational purposes only.

No Warranty: NDA does not warrant that any content or information contained on this knowledge-site is accurate, correct, complete or up-to-date, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any actual or threatened loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or otherwise. NDA assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the content and/or information contained on this knowledge-site, nor does it offer any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied in relation to such content or information.

Third-Party Links: NDA does not intend that links / URLs contained on this knowledge-site re-directing users to third party websites be considered as referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with any such third party website operators. NDA is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the content or information contained on such third party websites to which links may be provided on this knowledge-site.

No Legal Advice: By clicking ‘I agree’ and proceeding further, you acknowledge, represent and undertake that you on your own accord wish to know more about NDA, its capabilities and research content and information contained on the knowledge-site, for your own knowledge and personal use. The content and information contained on this knowledge-site should not be construed as nor relied upon as legal advice. You as a reader or recipient of content or information contained in this knowledge-site should not act, nor refrain from acting, based upon any or all of such content or information, but should always seek the advice of competent legal counsel licensed to practice the relevant law in the appropriate jurisdiction.

No Attorney-Client Relationship: This knowledge-site is not intended to be and you should not consider the content or information contained therein to be an advertisement, solicitation, inducement or invitation for an Attorney-Client relationship. Transmission, receipt or use of this knowledge-site, including content and information contained therein, does not constitute nor create an Attorney-Client relationship between NDA and you.