Friday, November 13, 2026
Latest:
2026High CourtLatestLegalService Law

Bombay HC quashes MSEDCL order cancelling Vidyut Sahayak selection due to pending FIR

legaldeli

Judgment dated 5.11.2026 of the High Court of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, in Writ Petition No.7335 of 2023 of Shaikh Shoeb Admed Faiuddin Shaikh  Vs.  State of Maharashtra and others

Denial of appointment on account of registration of FIR – Illegal

This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the communication/letter dated 16.06.2023 issued by respondent No. 2-MSEDCL, thereby rejecting candidature of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Vidyut Sahayak.

You May Also Like

SC Signals Zero Tolerance – Exemplary Costs for Illegal Allotment of HUDA Deluxe Flats to Reinforce Accountability in Administrative Actions

legaldeli

SC on grant of Bail – Cheating and Breach of Trust involving Rs.11.52 crores – Criminal Antecedents & Long Abscondence of accused

legaldeli

Bombay HC Upholds Award of Morya Infrastructure in Road Development BOT Contract Dispute & Toll Collection

legaldeli

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I HAVE READ THE DISCLAIMER AND AGREE TO IT.

User Acknowledgement

By proceeding further and clicking on the "AGREE" button herein below, I acknowledge that I of my own accord wish to know more about LegalDeli for my own information and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from LegalDeli or any of its members to create an Attorney-Client relationship through this knowledge site. I further acknowledge having read and understood the Disclaimer below.

Disclaimer
About: This knowledge-site (www.LegalDeli.in) is owned and operated by LegalDeli (“LD”), and is a resource for your informational and educational purposes only.

No Warranty: LD does not warrant that any content or information contained on this knowledge-site is accurate, correct, complete or up-to-date, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any actual or threatened loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or otherwise. LD assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the content and/or information contained on this knowledge-site, nor does it offer any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied in relation to such content or information.

Third-Party Links: LD does not intend that links / URLs contained on this knowledge-site re-directing users to third party websites be considered as referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with any such third party website operators. LD is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the content or information contained on such third party websites to which links may be provided on this knowledge-site.

No Legal Advice: By clicking ‘I agree’ and proceeding further, you acknowledge, represent and undertake that you on your own accord wish to know more about LD, its capabilities and research content and information contained on the knowledge-site, for your own knowledge and personal use. The content and information contained on this knowledge-site should not be construed as nor relied upon as legal advice. You as a reader or recipient of content or information contained in this knowledge-site should not act, nor refrain from acting, based upon any or all of such content or information, but should always seek the advice of competent legal counsel licensed to practice the relevant law in the appropriate jurisdiction.

No Attorney-Client Relationship: This knowledge-site is not intended to be and you should not consider the content or information contained therein to be an advertisement, solicitation, inducement or invitation for an Attorney-Client relationship. Transmission, receipt or use of this knowledge-site, including content and information contained therein, does not constitute nor create an Attorney-Client relationship between LD and you.

I Agree