2026High CourtLatestLegalMay 2026Service Law

Anganwadi Sevika – Retrospective Change of Age for Promotion

The conditions of service provide for retirement age of 65 years for Anganwadi Sevikas and 58 years for the Supervisors.

The Government Resolution dated 17.11.2001 provided for 25% of the Supervisors shall be filled in by promotion from Anganwadi Sevikas who shall be eligible for such promotion upto the age of 45 years.  This was changed to 55 years vide corrigendum dated 7.12.2001.

However, this eligibility age of 55 years was changed to 45 years vide Notification dated 4.6.2021 and made applicable to all Sevikas already recruited and working in the service.

The petitioners have challenged the legality of the said Notification and Rule 7(1)(c) of the Rules.

such classification creates an unreasonable discrimination between Anganwadi Sevikas who are otherwise similarly situated and has no rational nexus with the effective discharge of duties attached to the supervisory post. The petitioners, who are considered fit to discharge duties as Anganwadi Sevikas till the age of 65 years, are being held unfit to serve as Supervisors till the age of 58 years. Such discrimination by respondent No.2 – State of Maharashtra while formulating the impugned Rule 7(1)(c) of the aforesaid Rules is in clear violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.

we are at a loss to understand how an Anganwadi Sevika, who is considered fit for rendering services till the age of 65 years, is not considered fit for serving as an Anganwadi Supervisor, whose age of retirement is 58 years. Thus, in our considered opinion, such age restriction as imposed by the impugned Rule 7(1)(c) of the aforesaid Rules has no logical justification and treats similarly placed persons differently. The aforesaid Rule, in our considered opinion, is arbitrary and creates unreasonable discrimination between Anganwadi Sevikas possessing the same qualifications and therefore deserves to be declared unconstitutional.

Judgment dated 8.5.2026 of the High Court of Bombay, Bench at Nagpur, in Writ Petition No.2147 of 2023 of Chaya Tulshiram Kharat and others   Vs.  Hon’ble  Governor of Maharashtra and others

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I HAVE READ THE DISCLAIMER AND AGREE TO IT.

User Acknowledgement

By proceeding further and clicking on the "AGREE" button herein below, I acknowledge that I of my own accord wish to know more about LegalDeli for my own information and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from LegalDeli or any of its members to create an Attorney-Client relationship through this knowledge site. I further acknowledge having read and understood the Disclaimer below.

Disclaimer
About: This knowledge-site (www.LegalDeli.in) is owned and operated by LegalDeli (“LD”), and is a resource for your informational and educational purposes only.

No Warranty: LD does not warrant that any content or information contained on this knowledge-site is accurate, correct, complete or up-to-date, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any actual or threatened loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or otherwise. LD assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the content and/or information contained on this knowledge-site, nor does it offer any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied in relation to such content or information.

Third-Party Links: LD does not intend that links / URLs contained on this knowledge-site re-directing users to third party websites be considered as referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with any such third party website operators. LD is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the content or information contained on such third party websites to which links may be provided on this knowledge-site.

No Legal Advice: By clicking ‘I agree’ and proceeding further, you acknowledge, represent and undertake that you on your own accord wish to know more about LD, its capabilities and research content and information contained on the knowledge-site, for your own knowledge and personal use. The content and information contained on this knowledge-site should not be construed as nor relied upon as legal advice. You as a reader or recipient of content or information contained in this knowledge-site should not act, nor refrain from acting, based upon any or all of such content or information, but should always seek the advice of competent legal counsel licensed to practice the relevant law in the appropriate jurisdiction.

No Attorney-Client Relationship: This knowledge-site is not intended to be and you should not consider the content or information contained therein to be an advertisement, solicitation, inducement or invitation for an Attorney-Client relationship. Transmission, receipt or use of this knowledge-site, including content and information contained therein, does not constitute nor create an Attorney-Client relationship between LD and you.