2023April 2023General

Change in Wind Power Purchase Tariff – Prospective

Change in Wind Power Purchase Tariff – Prospective - Judgment dated 13.4.23 of the Supreme Court of India

Renewable Energy – Wind Power – Fixed long-term tariff for Wind Power Generators – Power Purchase Agreement of 29.3.2012 for fixed tariff of Rs.2.64 per unit for 25 years – Amendment of REC Regulations on 10.7.2013  to provide for tariff “at the pooled cost of power purchase” prospectively – Whether PPA require revision of PPA executed prior to 10.7.2013 – Whether the respondents were coerced to enter into PPA on 29.3.2012 – Standard of pleadings and evidence to establish coercion – 

On 29.1.2010 the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions for Recognition and Issuance of Renewable Energy Certificate for Renewable Energy Generation) Regulations 2010 were framed for development of a power market for non-conventional sources of energy.

Regulations of 2010 provided for floor price and forbearance price i.e. minimum and maximum price for trading in the power exchange, to be determined by CRC for the entire country.

By the Order dated 30.1.2010, the Gujarat State RC had framed GRC (Procurement of Energy from Renewable Sources) Regulations 2010 and determined the tariff for procurement of power by distribution licences from wind generators.

On 29.3.2012, the power purchase agreement between the Appellant Gujarat Urja and Wind Power Developers including respondent no.1 Renew Wind Energy Rajkot Ltd, was executed for tariff at Rs.2.64 per unit for 25 years.

On 8.8.2012, the State Commission determined the tariff for procurement of wind power from the projects commissioned during the control period of 11.8.2012 to 31.3.2016.

On 11.7.2013, the Central Commission amended REC Regulations 2010 and provided for “pooled cost of power purchase” in place of “at a price not exceeding cost of the power purchase”.   It was, however, provided that this amendment will not affect PPAs already executed.

In 2013, first two respondents herein filed the petition in the State Commission for change of PPA terms in view of amendment in REC Regulations and for tariff as per the amendment of 10.7.2013.

This petition was allowed on the ground that the Order dated 11.7.2013 of CRC was in general and applicable to all wind power generators.

The appeal of the appellant was rejected by the order dated 6.12.2018 of the Appellate Tribunal and also review petition vide order dated 24.7.2020.   This was challenged by the appellant in the Supreme Court.  It was held that the respondents were coerced to enter into PPAs.

HELD – that the Power Purchase Agreements entered into voluntarily by the parties before the second amendment of 2013 were not affected by its terms and that there was no coercion or duress on the respondents to execute PPAs.  It was held that the findings of coercion were recorded without proper pleadings or proof or without probing into evidence. 

Civil Appeal Nos.3480-3481 of 2020 – Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited and others Vs. Renew Wind Energy (Rajkot) Private Limited and others

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I HAVE READ THE DISCLAIMER AND AGREE TO IT.

User Acknowledgement

By proceeding further and clicking on the "AGREE" button herein below, I acknowledge that I of my own accord wish to know more about LegalDeli for my own information and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from LegalDeli or any of its members to create an Attorney-Client relationship through this knowledge site. I further acknowledge having read and understood the Disclaimer below.

Disclaimer
About: This knowledge-site (www.LegalDeli.in) is owned and operated by LegalDeli (“NDA”), and is a resource for your informational and educational purposes only.

No Warranty: NDA does not warrant that any content or information contained on this knowledge-site is accurate, correct, complete or up-to-date, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any actual or threatened loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or otherwise. NDA assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the content and/or information contained on this knowledge-site, nor does it offer any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied in relation to such content or information.

Third-Party Links: NDA does not intend that links / URLs contained on this knowledge-site re-directing users to third party websites be considered as referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with any such third party website operators. NDA is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the content or information contained on such third party websites to which links may be provided on this knowledge-site.

No Legal Advice: By clicking ‘I agree’ and proceeding further, you acknowledge, represent and undertake that you on your own accord wish to know more about NDA, its capabilities and research content and information contained on the knowledge-site, for your own knowledge and personal use. The content and information contained on this knowledge-site should not be construed as nor relied upon as legal advice. You as a reader or recipient of content or information contained in this knowledge-site should not act, nor refrain from acting, based upon any or all of such content or information, but should always seek the advice of competent legal counsel licensed to practice the relevant law in the appropriate jurisdiction.

No Attorney-Client Relationship: This knowledge-site is not intended to be and you should not consider the content or information contained therein to be an advertisement, solicitation, inducement or invitation for an Attorney-Client relationship. Transmission, receipt or use of this knowledge-site, including content and information contained therein, does not constitute nor create an Attorney-Client relationship between NDA and you.