SRA – New Road Line – Section 291 MMC Act
The petitioner had purchased the land of 6344.04 sq.mts at Malad, occupied partly by slum dwellers and partly by tenants. SRA sanctioned lay out of 6 buildings including development of land admeasuring 1375 sq.mts affected by the slum. Later on, the SRA approved the amalgamation of slum and non-slum portions of the plot vide LoI dated 20.4.2022.
The petitioner has completed several buildings and some of the buildings are under construction.
On 7.12.2023, the Respondent No.5 Developer and Respondent No.4 Society submitted SR scheme for the adjoining plot.
By letter dated 5.8.2024, SRA recommended proposal for new Road Line in the land of the petitioner as necessary for SR Scheme on the adjoining plot. This was accepted.
The petitioner has challenged the decision of 26.9.2024 of MCGM taken in consultation with SRA to sanction new Road Line of 13.40 meters in the land being developed by the petitioner.
HELD that when the proposed public street transgresses in any building requiring demolition, the owner / occupier thereof has to be heard. Municipal Corporation cannot unilaterally sanction the street without providing opportunity of hearing to the affected party. MCGM relied on the SRA’s NOC believing that no person was getting adversely affected by sanction of the RL. In fact, for both the pieces of the land the special planning authority is SRA. It has given sanction for the road through one SR Scheme for making another SR Scheme viable. Sanctioning of the impugned RL has affected the civil rights of the petitioner and therefore, hearing was necessary not specifically provided in Section 291 of the MMC Act.
Judgment dated 2.7.2025 of the High Court of Bombay in Writ Petition No.2207 of 2025 of Raghavendra Construction Company Pvt Ltd Vs. Municipal Commissioner and others
