Saturday, March 7, 2026

Latest:

Unconditional Withdrawal of Civil Suit – Whether Bar to Section 11 MOFA Application for Deemed Conveyance – Applicability of Order 26 Rule 1(4) CPC
Bombay HC Quashes Deemed Conveyance – Prior Civil Suit Unconditional Withdrawal Bars Fresh Application of Society under Section 11 MOFA.
Section 11 of MOFA – Deemed Conveyance – Postponement till formation of Apex Body of Societies
Bombay HC – Section 11 of MOFA – Deemed Conveyance – Objections of Promoter that Project was not complete and balance FSI is available for future development.
Bombay HC Clarifies Membership Law – Unregistered Transfers Cannot Confer Housing Society Rights and Ownership

Arrest & Remand – Exclusion of pre-arrest medical examination

July 2, 2025 legaldeli

On 5.3.2023, the complaint for offences of cheating, forgery and dishonestly obtaining Rs.3,37,30,000/- was filed against the petitioner, his wife and other persons. On 8.8.2023, the anticipatory bail application was rejected. In the meanwhile, the charge-sheet was filed.

On 25.10.2024 at 1 pm, the petitioner was taken into custody and produced before Shivajinagar Police Station. He was taken to Baramati and produced before Baramati Police Station on the same day at 5.07 pm

On 26.10.2024 at midnight 1.26 a.m. the petitioner was admitted in hospital and discharged at around 4.54 / 7 pm on the same day.

On 26.10.2024, the petitioner was arrested at 10.13 pm. And produced in the Court at 12.20 pm.

HELD that there is no provision for exclusion of time taken for pre-arrest medical examination. There is no requirement of pre-medical arrest. Section 46 of the Cr PC provides that in making an arrest, the police officer shall actually touch or confine the body of the person to be arrested. Section 53 provides for medical examination when a person is arrested on a charge of committing an offence and such an examination will afford evidence as to the commission of an offence.

The time taken for pre-arrest medical examination cannot be excluded from computing the period of 24 hours.

The petitioner was taken into custody on 25.10.2024 at 1.00 p.m. or at least at 5.07 p.m, the period of arrest begins and the production on 27.10.2024 at 12.20 p.m. would violate Article 22(2) of the Constitution of India and Section 57 Cr PC.

The contention that the writ petition cannot be entertained since regular bail in which the said issue was raised, was rejected, cannot be accepted since it is a petition for issue of writ of Habeas Corpus. If the arrest is illegal or without jurisdiction or violates Article 22 of the Constitution, then even if regular bail is rejected or remand is allowed, still the High Court can exercise its discretionary jurisdiction to issue Habeas Corpus writ.

Judgment dated 27.6.2025 of the High Court of Bombay in Criminal Writ Petition No.54 of 2025 of Hanumant Jagganath Nazirkar Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

I HAVE READ THE DISCLAIMER AND AGREE TO IT.

User Acknowledgement

By proceeding further and clicking on the "AGREE" button herein below, I acknowledge that I of my own accord wish to know more about LegalDeli for my own information and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from LegalDeli or any of its members to create an Attorney-Client relationship through this knowledge site. I further acknowledge having read and understood the Disclaimer below.

Disclaimer
About: This knowledge-site (www.LegalDeli.in) is owned and operated by LegalDeli (“NDA”), and is a resource for your informational and educational purposes only.

No Warranty: NDA does not warrant that any content or information contained on this knowledge-site is accurate, correct, complete or up-to-date, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any actual or threatened loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or otherwise. NDA assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the content and/or information contained on this knowledge-site, nor does it offer any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied in relation to such content or information.

Third-Party Links: NDA does not intend that links / URLs contained on this knowledge-site re-directing users to third party websites be considered as referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with any such third party website operators. NDA is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the content or information contained on such third party websites to which links may be provided on this knowledge-site.

No Legal Advice: By clicking ‘I agree’ and proceeding further, you acknowledge, represent and undertake that you on your own accord wish to know more about NDA, its capabilities and research content and information contained on the knowledge-site, for your own knowledge and personal use. The content and information contained on this knowledge-site should not be construed as nor relied upon as legal advice. You as a reader or recipient of content or information contained in this knowledge-site should not act, nor refrain from acting, based upon any or all of such content or information, but should always seek the advice of competent legal counsel licensed to practice the relevant law in the appropriate jurisdiction.

No Attorney-Client Relationship: This knowledge-site is not intended to be and you should not consider the content or information contained therein to be an advertisement, solicitation, inducement or invitation for an Attorney-Client relationship. Transmission, receipt or use of this knowledge-site, including content and information contained therein, does not constitute nor create an Attorney-Client relationship between NDA and you.