2026InsuranceLegalMotor Vehicles ActSupreme Court

A human-centric approach of SC on Motor Accident Compensation

Judgment dated   of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.13542 of 2026 of Sunil Kumar (total disable Rep. by wife)  Vs.   Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd with connected civil appeal

The claim petitions arose out of one single accident, which took place on 22.10.2016 at about 7:40 in the morning. The appellant in the first case-Sunil Kumar was a pillion rider, whereas the appellant in the second case named Sreejith K.S. was driving the scooter bearing Registration No. KL-64/C-6493, both going through Thrissur-Kodara public road. When they reached near Paliyekkara toll plaza, all of a sudden, another scooter bearing Registration No. KL-45/M-9130 which was driven by original respondent no.1 stated to have come in a rash and negligent manner and collided with the scooter of the appellants. The appellants were thrown on the ground and sustained serious injuries. The appellant – claimant in the first case, who was a pillion rider claimed Rs.50,00,000/-, whereas the driver of the scooter – the appellant in the second case claimed Rs. 15,00,000/- towards compensation for the injuries sustained by them.

As per the disability certificate Exhibit-X1 issued by the Medical Board, looking at the injuries suffered, the permanent disability was fixed at 75.5%. The contention on the part of the appellant that functional disability was required to be taken at 100% was not accepted by the Tribunal. The High Court did not touch the said aspect and maintained the disability at 75.5% as stated by the Medical Board.

The Tribunal awarded the compensation of Rs.19,91,954/-, whereas, the High Court enhanced to Rs.36,22,644/-.

Having regard to the nature of injuries suffered by the appellant in the first case and the resultant effect on his body and activity, it would be reasonable to take the permanent functional disability to the extent of 100%, and the amount towards loss of earning capacity would be calculated thus- Rs. 15,000/- monthly income multiplied by 12 which brings total annual income of Rs. 1,80,000/-. Since the permanent disability is to the extent of 100%, which will come to Rs. 1,80,000/-, further multiplied by 25% towards ‘future prospects, which comes to Rs. 45,000/ , therefore, Rs. 1,80,000/- + 45,000/-, total of which Rs. 2,25,000/-, multiplied by multiplier figure of 14, brings total amount of Rs. 31,50,000/- to be awarded towards ‘loss of earning capacity’ on the basis of 25% future prospects and 100% disability.

The Supreme Court enhanced the compensation to Rs.77,84,394/-.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I HAVE READ THE DISCLAIMER AND AGREE TO IT.

User Acknowledgement

By proceeding further and clicking on the "AGREE" button herein below, I acknowledge that I of my own accord wish to know more about LegalDeli for my own information and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from LegalDeli or any of its members to create an Attorney-Client relationship through this knowledge site. I further acknowledge having read and understood the Disclaimer below.

Disclaimer
About: This knowledge-site (www.LegalDeli.in) is owned and operated by LegalDeli (“LD”), and is a resource for your informational and educational purposes only.

No Warranty: LD does not warrant that any content or information contained on this knowledge-site is accurate, correct, complete or up-to-date, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any actual or threatened loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or otherwise. LD assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the content and/or information contained on this knowledge-site, nor does it offer any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied in relation to such content or information.

Third-Party Links: LD does not intend that links / URLs contained on this knowledge-site re-directing users to third party websites be considered as referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with any such third party website operators. LD is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the content or information contained on such third party websites to which links may be provided on this knowledge-site.

No Legal Advice: By clicking ‘I agree’ and proceeding further, you acknowledge, represent and undertake that you on your own accord wish to know more about LD, its capabilities and research content and information contained on the knowledge-site, for your own knowledge and personal use. The content and information contained on this knowledge-site should not be construed as nor relied upon as legal advice. You as a reader or recipient of content or information contained in this knowledge-site should not act, nor refrain from acting, based upon any or all of such content or information, but should always seek the advice of competent legal counsel licensed to practice the relevant law in the appropriate jurisdiction.

No Attorney-Client Relationship: This knowledge-site is not intended to be and you should not consider the content or information contained therein to be an advertisement, solicitation, inducement or invitation for an Attorney-Client relationship. Transmission, receipt or use of this knowledge-site, including content and information contained therein, does not constitute nor create an Attorney-Client relationship between LD and you.