2026CooperativeHousing SocietyLegal

Vexatious Suit Without Cause of Action – Rejection under Order VII Rule 11 CPC

Judgment dated 2.9.2026 of the High Court of Bombay in Civil Revision Application No.57 of 2020 of Laxmi charitable Trust and others  Vs.  Laxmi Estate Coop Housing Society Ltd and others with connected revision.

A civil suit must disclose genuine cause of action – Plaint deserves rejection under Order VII Rule 11 CPC

Civil Suit Rejected as Vexatious & Devoid of Cause of action – Order VII  Rule 11 of CPC

Litigation without cause of action – A case for rejection of Plaint

Bombay HC on Clever Drafting & Real Cause of Action to File Suit

The plaintiffs housing societies filed civil suit for declaration for joint ownership of suit property including amenity area, facility on the layout and also sught conveyance of recreation ground and FSI.

The defendants’ application for rejection of plaint under Order VII rule 11 of the CPC was dismissed.

Thus, on a holistic reading of the entire Plaint, it is more than apparent that the Suit discloses no cause of action. As aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have already secured conveyance in respect of Sub-Plot Nos. A, B and C on 27 November 2015 and 30 May 2017. They are now seeking to establish rights in respect of what is being operated by Defendant Nos.3 and 10 Trusts as college and Girls’ schools. It is unfortunate that the playground used by college and Girls’ schools are sought to be claimed by the Plaintiffs-Society. The suit is thus clearly vexatious.

Applying the above principles to the facts of the present case, it is seen that the documents attached with the Plaint are the basis for filing of the suit. Perusal of the conditions of sanctioned layout and development permissions granted qua Sub Plot Nos. A, B and C leaves no manner of doubt that there is no cause to sue. The suit is also based on non-existent provision of MOF Rules. On a meaningful reading of the Plaint together with the documents attached therewith indicates that there is no remote chance of the Plaintiffs succeeding in the Suit. The entire Plaint is essentially premised on two averments, which are demonstrably false and are cleverly drafted to make a picture of accrual of a cause of action, which none actually exists. The Suit is manifestly vexatious as the same is based on pleadings which are contrary to documents accompanying Plaint or on non-existent provision of law.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I HAVE READ THE DISCLAIMER AND AGREE TO IT.

User Acknowledgement

By proceeding further and clicking on the "AGREE" button herein below, I acknowledge that I of my own accord wish to know more about LegalDeli for my own information and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from LegalDeli or any of its members to create an Attorney-Client relationship through this knowledge site. I further acknowledge having read and understood the Disclaimer below.

Disclaimer
About: This knowledge-site (www.LegalDeli.in) is owned and operated by LegalDeli (“LD”), and is a resource for your informational and educational purposes only.

No Warranty: LD does not warrant that any content or information contained on this knowledge-site is accurate, correct, complete or up-to-date, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any actual or threatened loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or otherwise. LD assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the content and/or information contained on this knowledge-site, nor does it offer any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied in relation to such content or information.

Third-Party Links: LD does not intend that links / URLs contained on this knowledge-site re-directing users to third party websites be considered as referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with any such third party website operators. LD is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the content or information contained on such third party websites to which links may be provided on this knowledge-site.

No Legal Advice: By clicking ‘I agree’ and proceeding further, you acknowledge, represent and undertake that you on your own accord wish to know more about LD, its capabilities and research content and information contained on the knowledge-site, for your own knowledge and personal use. The content and information contained on this knowledge-site should not be construed as nor relied upon as legal advice. You as a reader or recipient of content or information contained in this knowledge-site should not act, nor refrain from acting, based upon any or all of such content or information, but should always seek the advice of competent legal counsel licensed to practice the relevant law in the appropriate jurisdiction.

No Attorney-Client Relationship: This knowledge-site is not intended to be and you should not consider the content or information contained therein to be an advertisement, solicitation, inducement or invitation for an Attorney-Client relationship. Transmission, receipt or use of this knowledge-site, including content and information contained therein, does not constitute nor create an Attorney-Client relationship between LD and you.