Why Seat Prevails over Venue in Arbitration
Judgment dated 15.4.2026 of the Supreme Court in Diary No.44792 of 2025 of J&K Economic Reconstruction Agency Vs. Rash Builders India Private Limited
By the order dated 26.3.2016, the Arbitral Tribunal with the consent of the parties fixed Srinagar as seat and New Delhi as venue of the arbitration.
After the death of the Arbitrator on 26.4.2021, the High Court appointed another Arbitrator to continue the proceedings.
The arbitral award was passed on 15.1.2024 at New Delhi.
The appellant filed section 34 petition in JK High Court. On the preliminary objection of the respondent, the HC returned the petition since the arbitration and the award was passed at New Delhi.
In the present case, not only have the parties expressly agreed upon Srinagar as seat of arbitration, but even the surrounding circumstances reinforce this conclusion. The contracts are executed in the State of Jammu & Kashmir and the works were to be carried out within the said State. The arbitration proceedings were initiated in the State of Jammu and Kashmir and the High Court had appointed the arbitrator. These factors as well as the ‘closest and most intimate connection test’ unmistakably anchors the arbitration at Srinagar.

