2024High CourtInsuranceJune 2024LatestLegal

Motor Accident – Low Vision Vs. Blindness – Claimant MBBS doctor

In the accident of 18.11.2005, the claimant had suffered injuries on her head, chest and resulting in loss of vision.   She had had completed MBBS one year prior to the said incident and earning stipend of Rs.8,200/- per month.

The Medical Certificate mentioned that the vision is restricted to 10 degrees 6/18 (p), 6/24(p) Central and 75% visual disability.

The Tribunal held that the claimant would not be able to read, cross road easily, see the vehicle from right side and suffer in her medical profession.   However, it was held that this visual disability would affect earning capacity to 10% only.

HELD that Section 2(b)(iii) of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995, defines “blindness” as limitation of the field of vision subtending an angle of 20 degree or worse.   The Schedule B to the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, defines “Visual Impairment” as blindness for limitation of the field of vision subtending an angle of less than 10 degree. The low vision is defined “limitation of the field of vision subtending an angle of less than 40 degree upto 10 degree.

Thus, a person is considered legally blind if the vision is less than 10 degrees.   In any event, the functional disability of the doctor having 10 degrees 6/18 (p), 6/24(p) Central should be considered blind.

The Claimant’s vision is less than the low vision and falls in the category of blindness.   The loss of central eyesight of the claimant would amount to an end to the claimant’s earning capacity as an MBBS doctor.   The claimant will not be able to treat patient with such diminished eye-sight.  Thus, it can be said that the claimant has lost her capacity to earn income as a doctor. She would not be able to earn income as MBBS doctor.  As such the finding of the Tribunal to the extent of loss of 10% earning capacity is illegal.

Judgment dated 24.6.2024 of the Bombay High Court in First Appeal No.772 of 2023 of Madhavi Chintamani Shastrabuddhe Vers. Jarloksingh H.S. Talwar and others

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I HAVE READ THE DISCLAIMER AND AGREE TO IT.

User Acknowledgement

By proceeding further and clicking on the "AGREE" button herein below, I acknowledge that I of my own accord wish to know more about LegalDeli for my own information and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from LegalDeli or any of its members to create an Attorney-Client relationship through this knowledge site. I further acknowledge having read and understood the Disclaimer below.

Disclaimer
About: This knowledge-site (www.LegalDeli.in) is owned and operated by LegalDeli (“NDA”), and is a resource for your informational and educational purposes only.

No Warranty: NDA does not warrant that any content or information contained on this knowledge-site is accurate, correct, complete or up-to-date, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any actual or threatened loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or otherwise. NDA assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the content and/or information contained on this knowledge-site, nor does it offer any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied in relation to such content or information.

Third-Party Links: NDA does not intend that links / URLs contained on this knowledge-site re-directing users to third party websites be considered as referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with any such third party website operators. NDA is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the content or information contained on such third party websites to which links may be provided on this knowledge-site.

No Legal Advice: By clicking ‘I agree’ and proceeding further, you acknowledge, represent and undertake that you on your own accord wish to know more about NDA, its capabilities and research content and information contained on the knowledge-site, for your own knowledge and personal use. The content and information contained on this knowledge-site should not be construed as nor relied upon as legal advice. You as a reader or recipient of content or information contained in this knowledge-site should not act, nor refrain from acting, based upon any or all of such content or information, but should always seek the advice of competent legal counsel licensed to practice the relevant law in the appropriate jurisdiction.

No Attorney-Client Relationship: This knowledge-site is not intended to be and you should not consider the content or information contained therein to be an advertisement, solicitation, inducement or invitation for an Attorney-Client relationship. Transmission, receipt or use of this knowledge-site, including content and information contained therein, does not constitute nor create an Attorney-Client relationship between NDA and you.