2025High CourtLatestLegalNovember 2025Service Law

Forfeiture of Gratuity of Bank Regional Manager – Bombay HC

Judgment dated 4.11.2025 of the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, in Writ Petition No.154 of 2022 of the  General Manager (HRM), Bank of Maharashtra  Vs.  Shri Prakash Vishnu Shinde and others

Payment of Gratuity Act

Does penalty of  compulsory retirement amount to “termination of service” under Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, to forfeit gratuity.

The petitioner- Bank of Maharashtra had initiated departmental inquiry against respondent no.1 Regional Manager, Goa.   He was placed under suspension.   However, he retired on superannuation and the inquiry culminated in compulsory retirement punishment.

By the order dated 29.4.2016, the petitioner Bank had forfeited the gratuity of the respondent no.1.

Respondent nos.2 and 3 allowed the application for the respondent no.1 and set-aside the order of gratuity forfeiture.

The question is whether the order of compulsory retirement amount to termination of services to sustain the gratuity forfeiture.

Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of the Payment of Gratuity Act shows that the forfeiture gratuity order can be passed only if services are terminated on account of an involving moral turpitude.   If punishment other than termination of services is imposed, then gratuity cannot be forfeited under the said provision.

The Bank of Maharashtra Officers’  Service Regulations, 1979, Bank of Maharashtra Officer Employees (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976 and the Bank of Maharashtra (Employees’) Pension Regulations, 1995, will be relevant answering the issue.

Regulation 46 of the BoM Officers Service Regulations deal with gratuity. Therefore, even under the said Regulations, the right to receive gratuity can be denied only in case of termination.  The Discipline and Appeal Regulations clearly show that compulsory retirement is a majority penalty.  However, compulsory retirement is not punitive under Regulation 20(1)(a) of the Service Regulations.

HELD that the orders of both  the respondent nos.2 and 3 are unsustainable in law and therefore, quashed.

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I HAVE READ THE DISCLAIMER AND AGREE TO IT.

User Acknowledgement

By proceeding further and clicking on the "AGREE" button herein below, I acknowledge that I of my own accord wish to know more about LegalDeli for my own information and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from LegalDeli or any of its members to create an Attorney-Client relationship through this knowledge site. I further acknowledge having read and understood the Disclaimer below.

Disclaimer
About: This knowledge-site (www.LegalDeli.in) is owned and operated by LegalDeli (“NDA”), and is a resource for your informational and educational purposes only.

No Warranty: NDA does not warrant that any content or information contained on this knowledge-site is accurate, correct, complete or up-to-date, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any actual or threatened loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or otherwise. NDA assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the content and/or information contained on this knowledge-site, nor does it offer any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied in relation to such content or information.

Third-Party Links: NDA does not intend that links / URLs contained on this knowledge-site re-directing users to third party websites be considered as referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with any such third party website operators. NDA is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the content or information contained on such third party websites to which links may be provided on this knowledge-site.

No Legal Advice: By clicking ‘I agree’ and proceeding further, you acknowledge, represent and undertake that you on your own accord wish to know more about NDA, its capabilities and research content and information contained on the knowledge-site, for your own knowledge and personal use. The content and information contained on this knowledge-site should not be construed as nor relied upon as legal advice. You as a reader or recipient of content or information contained in this knowledge-site should not act, nor refrain from acting, based upon any or all of such content or information, but should always seek the advice of competent legal counsel licensed to practice the relevant law in the appropriate jurisdiction.

No Attorney-Client Relationship: This knowledge-site is not intended to be and you should not consider the content or information contained therein to be an advertisement, solicitation, inducement or invitation for an Attorney-Client relationship. Transmission, receipt or use of this knowledge-site, including content and information contained therein, does not constitute nor create an Attorney-Client relationship between NDA and you.