ArbitrationLatestLegalOctober 2023

Arbitration – Section 37 – Issues never canvassed before the Arbitrator and in section 34 petition cannot be raised afresh in appeal

 Arbitration – Section 37 – Issues never canvassed before the Arbitrator and in section 34 petition cannot be raised in appeal under Section 37

Deceased Sheru and Suleman were the partners of the respondent no.1 partnership of restaurant business at Mumbai as per the deed dated 7.11.1960.   Thereafter, four deeds of partnership were executed in 1965, 1970, 1975 and 1992.  

On 26.8.2002, Sheru died but his legal heirs i.e. appellants and one Abdul Wahid were not inducted in the partnership business.   The disputes between the parties led the Firm to file a suit in 2003 against the appellants for injunction.  Another suit was filed in 2006 for recovery of possession of the restaurant premises.

On 12.9.2006, the High Court referred the disputes between the parties in both the suits and other disputes to arbitration.

The Arbitrator passed the award for restoration of restaurant to the Firm and granted compensation.   This was confirmed in the arbitration petition by the learned Single Judge.

In appeal before the Division Bench, number of contentions were raised by the appellants to challenge the award and also the order in the arbitration petition.

HELD (i) the appeal must fail since the award was challenged on grounds afresh and never taken before the Arbitrator and the Single Bench; (ii) the order of Single Bench is not assailed in appeal, whereas, the entire challenge in the appeal is to the award; (iii) the contention that the partnership deeds were not stamped and registered was taken for the first in section 37 appeal.   Secondly, there is no compulsory registration of partnership deeds.   Moreover, fourth and fifth deeds were on stamp paper of Rs.100 as per requisite stamp duty of Article 4 of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. Similarly, the reference to arbitration was not as per partnership deeds but by consent of the parties pursuant to the order of the Court; (iv) there is no patent illegality in the award and (v) a party which has not filed section 34 application to challenge award cannot assail award on any ground in appeal.  The Award has attained finality against such a party.

Judgment dated 25.10.2023 of the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in Commercial Appeal No.18 of 2023 in Comm.Arbitration Petition No.1286 of 2019 in Azizur Rehman Gulam Rasool and another Vs.  M/s. Radio Restaurant, a partnership firm, Mumbai and others.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I HAVE READ THE DISCLAIMER AND AGREE TO IT.

User Acknowledgement

By proceeding further and clicking on the "AGREE" button herein below, I acknowledge that I of my own accord wish to know more about LegalDeli for my own information and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from LegalDeli or any of its members to create an Attorney-Client relationship through this knowledge site. I further acknowledge having read and understood the Disclaimer below.

Disclaimer
About: This knowledge-site (www.LegalDeli.in) is owned and operated by LegalDeli (“NDA”), and is a resource for your informational and educational purposes only.

No Warranty: NDA does not warrant that any content or information contained on this knowledge-site is accurate, correct, complete or up-to-date, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any actual or threatened loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or otherwise. NDA assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the content and/or information contained on this knowledge-site, nor does it offer any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied in relation to such content or information.

Third-Party Links: NDA does not intend that links / URLs contained on this knowledge-site re-directing users to third party websites be considered as referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with any such third party website operators. NDA is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the content or information contained on such third party websites to which links may be provided on this knowledge-site.

No Legal Advice: By clicking ‘I agree’ and proceeding further, you acknowledge, represent and undertake that you on your own accord wish to know more about NDA, its capabilities and research content and information contained on the knowledge-site, for your own knowledge and personal use. The content and information contained on this knowledge-site should not be construed as nor relied upon as legal advice. You as a reader or recipient of content or information contained in this knowledge-site should not act, nor refrain from acting, based upon any or all of such content or information, but should always seek the advice of competent legal counsel licensed to practice the relevant law in the appropriate jurisdiction.

No Attorney-Client Relationship: This knowledge-site is not intended to be and you should not consider the content or information contained therein to be an advertisement, solicitation, inducement or invitation for an Attorney-Client relationship. Transmission, receipt or use of this knowledge-site, including content and information contained therein, does not constitute nor create an Attorney-Client relationship between NDA and you.