Latest

I HAVE READ THE DISCLAIMER AND AGREE TO IT.

User Acknowledgement

By proceeding further and clicking on the "AGREE" button herein below, I acknowledge that I of my own accord wish to know more about LegalDeli for my own information and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from LegalDeli or any of its members to create an Attorney-Client relationship through this knowledge site. I further acknowledge having read and understood the Disclaimer below.

Disclaimer
About: This knowledge-site (www.LegalDeli.in) is owned and operated by LegalDeli (“LD”), and is a resource for your informational and educational purposes only.

No Warranty: LD does not warrant that any content or information contained on this knowledge-site is accurate, correct, complete or up-to-date, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any actual or threatened loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or otherwise. LD assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the content and/or information contained on this knowledge-site, nor does it offer any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied in relation to such content or information.

Third-Party Links: LD does not intend that links / URLs contained on this knowledge-site re-directing users to third party websites be considered as referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with any such third party website operators. LD is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the content or information contained on such third party websites to which links may be provided on this knowledge-site.

No Legal Advice: By clicking ‘I agree’ and proceeding further, you acknowledge, represent and undertake that you on your own accord wish to know more about LD, its capabilities and research content and information contained on the knowledge-site, for your own knowledge and personal use. The content and information contained on this knowledge-site should not be construed as nor relied upon as legal advice. You as a reader or recipient of content or information contained in this knowledge-site should not act, nor refrain from acting, based upon any or all of such content or information, but should always seek the advice of competent legal counsel licensed to practice the relevant law in the appropriate jurisdiction.

No Attorney-Client Relationship: This knowledge-site is not intended to be and you should not consider the content or information contained therein to be an advertisement, solicitation, inducement or invitation for an Attorney-Client relationship. Transmission, receipt or use of this knowledge-site, including content and information contained therein, does not constitute nor create an Attorney-Client relationship between LD and you.

Gold Jewellery of Iranian Nationals seized at the airport was sold even before confiscation by the Customs.

Sections 17 and 37(2)(b) of AA – Legality of Arbitrator order refusing interim relief since Term Sheet is not a concluded contract.

Sections 9 and 11 of the Arbitration Act & SARFAESI Act – Arbitrator OR DR Tribunal – Petitioner is non-banking financial institution giving loans for purchase of vehicles.

Income Tax Act 1961 – Offence under Sections 276-B read with 278-B – In the absence of mandatory notice of Section 2(35)(b) delivered to the Director – accused no.8, he cannot be treated as principal officer for prosecution.

Arbitration – Section 11 – Section 19(2)(a) of the Partnerships Act – Invocation of arbitration by one set of partners of the partnership – Notice is defective

IRDAI – Cyclone Michaung – Circular dated 18.12.2023 – Salutary decision to grant special dispensation to General Insurers and increasing limit of losses for appointment of Surveyors and Loss Assessors

Arbitration – Section 8 – Arbitration clause in tripartite agreements was basis for subsequent agreements challenged in the civil suit

FEMA – Foreign remittances of Jaipur IPL franchisee in 2008 – Violation – Burden to prove and quantum of Penalty – Specific finding on the specific role of individual is essential for imposing penalty

Copyright Act, 1957 – Interplay between Section 60 and its proviso on suit for declaration that the allegations of copyright infringement by the defendant were groundless.

Charge-sheet – documents / material produced by accused and also seized during investigation were not filed – Sections 91 and 173(5) of Cr PC