Section 9 AA – Interim relief for gag order on distributing from making disparaging statements
The Respondent is the distributor of the Petitioner in Australia as per the Distribution Agreement dated 26.12.2017. Unique case of
Read MoreThe Respondent is the distributor of the Petitioner in Australia as per the Distribution Agreement dated 26.12.2017. Unique case of
Read MoreIn 2023, the plaintiff submitted tender and approached SBI for bid bond / performance security of USD 1,50,000. SBI approached
Read MoreAs per NCLT’s order dated 27.4.2020, City Corporation Limited, Pune, engaged in construction and developing infrastructure facilities, was merged with
Read MoreBy the order dated 17.8.2023, the Registrar of Trade Marks refused the registration of device marks “Prakartik Paint” in Marathi
Read MoreOn 19.8.2017, the petitioners – Developers were removed from SR Scheme under Section 13(2) of the Slum Act. This was
Read MoreThe wife of the petitioner had taken treatment for chronic kidney disease from 2014 to 2016 in the hospital at
Read MoreService of Notice through Whatsapp or other electronic modes– Section 41-A Cr PC and Section 35 of BNSS 2023. The
Read MoreSection 18 does not use the expression “supplier”. It employs the phrase “any party to a dispute may” Silpi Industries
Read MoreAgreement of sale dated 30.8.2014 was executed between the appellants and the developer for purchase of residential flat at Lodha
Read More