ArbitrationHigh CourtLatestLegalMay 2024

Arbitration Clause in original contract perishes with it subsequent to the  settlement agreement foreclosing earlier contracts between the parties

 

The plaintiff was awarded contract for development of housing society “IREO Victory Valley” for Rs.3.03 crores vide letter of intent dated 11.2.2011.  Further work orders were also issued. 

The plaintiff issued demand notice dated 11.1.2019 asking the defendant to pay due amount of more than Rs.107 crores.

On 18.1.2020, there was settlement agreement and the earlier contracts were fore-closed.

On 13.6.2021 the plaintiff sent two demand notices for unpaid operational debt of Rs.18.76 crores.  However, the defendant repudiated the same vide letter dated 28.6.2022.

On 3.8.2022, the plaintiff filed IBC section 9 petition for CIRP against the defendant and same is pending.

The plaintiff filed the summary suit for compensation in respect of Settlement Agreement dated 18.1.2020.

HELD that the important question was if the settlement is within the contract itself and not outside of it, the contract would not be rescinded and hence, the arbitration clause in the original contract would still be applicable.  In other words, the question is whether the original contract itself is discharged or not.  Another question is whether if there is substantial dispute as to whether the original contract is superseded or not, the parties ought to be referred to arbitration.  The original contract was that the plaintiff was to render services to the defendant.  However, the nature of Settlement Agreement itself is different in respect of amounts payable to the plaintiff and other aspects. Moreover, the Settlement mentions that this would be a foreclosure agreement and full & final settlement.  If there is unilateral repudiation then the arbitration clause may survive depending on the facts of the case.  It is, however, curious that the Defendant insists for arbitration without denying the existence of the Settlement Agreement.  Arbitration cannot be used as a straw to delay the adjudication and escape liabilities and obligations under the Settlement Agreement.

Judgment dated 24.4.2024 in CS (COMM) 534 of 2023 of Larsen and Toubro Limited Vs. IREO Victory Valley Pvt Limited with connected matter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I HAVE READ THE DISCLAIMER AND AGREE TO IT.

User Acknowledgement

By proceeding further and clicking on the "AGREE" button herein below, I acknowledge that I of my own accord wish to know more about LegalDeli for my own information and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from LegalDeli or any of its members to create an Attorney-Client relationship through this knowledge site. I further acknowledge having read and understood the Disclaimer below.

Disclaimer
About: This knowledge-site (www.LegalDeli.in) is owned and operated by LegalDeli (“NDA”), and is a resource for your informational and educational purposes only.

No Warranty: NDA does not warrant that any content or information contained on this knowledge-site is accurate, correct, complete or up-to-date, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any actual or threatened loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or otherwise. NDA assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the content and/or information contained on this knowledge-site, nor does it offer any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied in relation to such content or information.

Third-Party Links: NDA does not intend that links / URLs contained on this knowledge-site re-directing users to third party websites be considered as referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with any such third party website operators. NDA is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the content or information contained on such third party websites to which links may be provided on this knowledge-site.

No Legal Advice: By clicking ‘I agree’ and proceeding further, you acknowledge, represent and undertake that you on your own accord wish to know more about NDA, its capabilities and research content and information contained on the knowledge-site, for your own knowledge and personal use. The content and information contained on this knowledge-site should not be construed as nor relied upon as legal advice. You as a reader or recipient of content or information contained in this knowledge-site should not act, nor refrain from acting, based upon any or all of such content or information, but should always seek the advice of competent legal counsel licensed to practice the relevant law in the appropriate jurisdiction.

No Attorney-Client Relationship: This knowledge-site is not intended to be and you should not consider the content or information contained therein to be an advertisement, solicitation, inducement or invitation for an Attorney-Client relationship. Transmission, receipt or use of this knowledge-site, including content and information contained therein, does not constitute nor create an Attorney-Client relationship between NDA and you.