2024InsuranceLatestLegalMay 2024Supreme Court

LIC – Concluded Contract of Insurance – SC important decis

Life Insurance – Proposal and premium cheque prior to accidental death due to electric shock – Policy prepared before death but not communicated and blocked – Repudiation of Claim for non existence of concluded contract

On 6.7.1996, the deceased husband of the appellant submitted proposal for LIC policy and on 9.7.1996 issued the cheque for premium on State Bank of Saurastra.

On 14.7.1996, the husband of the appellant died in an accident due to electric shock.  The insurance claim was repudiated on the grounds that the proposal was not accepted and there was no concluded contract.

In fact, the policy was prepared but was not communicated to the deceased.  In fact, it was blocked on 15.7.1996.  According to LIC, the proposal was accepted only on 15.7.1996 and death occurred on 14.7.1996.

The District Consumer Forum allowed the consumer complaint vide order dated 19.7.2001.   The appeal of the LIC was dismissed by the State Consumer Commission vide order dated 25.7.2006.

However, the National Commission allowed the revision of LIC and dismissed the complaint of the appellant.

Mere receipt and retention of the premium until after the death of the insured or even mere preparation of the policy and its blocking would not amount to acceptance of the proposal for insurance policy.

After dismissing the complaint, the NCDRC directed payment of Rs.1 lakhs as ex-gratia as offered by LIC in its revision.

 

It is not the case of the respondent that the cheque was dishonoured.

The entire circumstances based on the documents and discussed in the orders of the District Forum and State Commission constrain us to hold that the proposal was accepted.    There is incongruity in the contentions and the documents.

Along with written submission of the respondent, true copy of suspense memorandum / first premium receipt was produced as Annexure B.    A perusal of the same would reveal certain disturbing aspects as noted in paras 24 to 26 of the judgment.

Judgment dated 8.5.2024 in Civil Appeal No.270 of 2012 of Mrs. Bhumikaben N. Modi and others Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I HAVE READ THE DISCLAIMER AND AGREE TO IT.

User Acknowledgement

By proceeding further and clicking on the "AGREE" button herein below, I acknowledge that I of my own accord wish to know more about LegalDeli for my own information and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from LegalDeli or any of its members to create an Attorney-Client relationship through this knowledge site. I further acknowledge having read and understood the Disclaimer below.

Disclaimer
About: This knowledge-site (www.LegalDeli.in) is owned and operated by LegalDeli (“NDA”), and is a resource for your informational and educational purposes only.

No Warranty: NDA does not warrant that any content or information contained on this knowledge-site is accurate, correct, complete or up-to-date, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any actual or threatened loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or otherwise. NDA assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the content and/or information contained on this knowledge-site, nor does it offer any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied in relation to such content or information.

Third-Party Links: NDA does not intend that links / URLs contained on this knowledge-site re-directing users to third party websites be considered as referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with any such third party website operators. NDA is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the content or information contained on such third party websites to which links may be provided on this knowledge-site.

No Legal Advice: By clicking ‘I agree’ and proceeding further, you acknowledge, represent and undertake that you on your own accord wish to know more about NDA, its capabilities and research content and information contained on the knowledge-site, for your own knowledge and personal use. The content and information contained on this knowledge-site should not be construed as nor relied upon as legal advice. You as a reader or recipient of content or information contained in this knowledge-site should not act, nor refrain from acting, based upon any or all of such content or information, but should always seek the advice of competent legal counsel licensed to practice the relevant law in the appropriate jurisdiction.

No Attorney-Client Relationship: This knowledge-site is not intended to be and you should not consider the content or information contained therein to be an advertisement, solicitation, inducement or invitation for an Attorney-Client relationship. Transmission, receipt or use of this knowledge-site, including content and information contained therein, does not constitute nor create an Attorney-Client relationship between NDA and you.