2026EducationHigh CourtLatestLegalSchoolService Law

Part-time Librarian Service in Aided School and Old Pension Scheme

On 12.6.1995, the petitioner was appointed as Part Time Librarian for one year in the aided school. On 12.6.1998, the petitioner was given permanent appointment on the said post.  Both the appointments were approved by the Education Officer.

On 31.10.2005, the Government adopted Defined Contribution Pension Scheme in place of old pension scheme, for the government employees appointed on or after 1.11.2005.

By the Government Resolution dated 3.8.2006, the  post was upgraded to full time Librarian in non-government aided secondary schools.  The said resolution did not mention about the past part time service for pensionable service.

The petitioner’s contention is that the said cut-off date of 1 November, 2005 as prescribed under the GR dated 31 October 2005 would not be applicable to the petitioner inasmuch as the petitioner was in service on the post of part-time librarian from 12 June 1995 on an aided post. It is his case that G.R. dated 03 August 2006 does not provide that the earlier service as rendered by the petitioner from 12 June 1995 till 31 March 2006 should be discarded and/or not to be taken into consideration, so as to hold the petitioner ineligible for the benefit of the Old Pension Scheme.

The question which falls for determination is whether the petitioner would become entitled for pension under the old pension scheme by taking into consideration the petitioner’s part time employment as librarian during the period from 1995-96 to 2005-06.

it is quite clear that, in the facts and circumstances of the present case, it would be arbitrary on the part of the respondent to exclude the period of service rendered by the petitioner from 12 June 1995 to 31 March 2006 on the post of part-time librarian for the purpose of determining the qualifying service. In our opinion, Rule 57 Note 1 of the MCS (Pension) Rules would thus become applicable, and 50% of the period of part time service rendered by the petitioner would be required to be taken into consideration for calculating the qualifying service for the purpose of pension. Accordingly, the petitioner would become entitled to pension under the old pension scheme, by taking into consideration 50% of the period of service rendered as a part-time librarian together with the period of service spent on the full-time post of librarian, for determining the petitioner’s pensionable service. Accordingly, the petitioner’s qualifying service for the purpose of pension would Page 43 of 44 Uploaded on – 11/09/2026 Downloaded on – 16/09/2026 20:41:05 WP 11651-23.DOC be about 23 years (i.e approximately 5 years 4 months, i.e. , 50 % of service as part time librarian and 17 years 8 months as full time librarian) which is a period of about 5 years prior to the cut of date of 1 November 2005 being reckoned towards the qualifying service for the grant of pension.

Judgment dated 11.9.2026 of the High Court of Bombay in Writ Petition No.11651 of 2023 of Dadasaheb Sada Kadam  Vs.  The State of Maharashtra and others

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I HAVE READ THE DISCLAIMER AND AGREE TO IT.

User Acknowledgement

By proceeding further and clicking on the "AGREE" button herein below, I acknowledge that I of my own accord wish to know more about LegalDeli for my own information and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from LegalDeli or any of its members to create an Attorney-Client relationship through this knowledge site. I further acknowledge having read and understood the Disclaimer below.

Disclaimer
About: This knowledge-site (www.LegalDeli.in) is owned and operated by LegalDeli (“LD”), and is a resource for your informational and educational purposes only.

No Warranty: LD does not warrant that any content or information contained on this knowledge-site is accurate, correct, complete or up-to-date, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any actual or threatened loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or otherwise. LD assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the content and/or information contained on this knowledge-site, nor does it offer any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied in relation to such content or information.

Third-Party Links: LD does not intend that links / URLs contained on this knowledge-site re-directing users to third party websites be considered as referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with any such third party website operators. LD is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the content or information contained on such third party websites to which links may be provided on this knowledge-site.

No Legal Advice: By clicking ‘I agree’ and proceeding further, you acknowledge, represent and undertake that you on your own accord wish to know more about LD, its capabilities and research content and information contained on the knowledge-site, for your own knowledge and personal use. The content and information contained on this knowledge-site should not be construed as nor relied upon as legal advice. You as a reader or recipient of content or information contained in this knowledge-site should not act, nor refrain from acting, based upon any or all of such content or information, but should always seek the advice of competent legal counsel licensed to practice the relevant law in the appropriate jurisdiction.

No Attorney-Client Relationship: This knowledge-site is not intended to be and you should not consider the content or information contained therein to be an advertisement, solicitation, inducement or invitation for an Attorney-Client relationship. Transmission, receipt or use of this knowledge-site, including content and information contained therein, does not constitute nor create an Attorney-Client relationship between LD and you.