2026April 2026ArbitrationHigh CourtInsuranceLatestLegal

Insurance – Stock Valuation – Reports of Surveyor   Vs  Audit

The petitioner had taken insurance fire policy for Rs.30 crores for 2016-2017.  On 25.4.2017, there was fire in the godown.    The petitioner submitted claim for Rs.37,27,22,010/-.  The surveyor had assessed the loss of Rs.20,65,27,032/- vide report dated 9.7.2018.  However, the respondent unilaterally reduced the said loss to Rs.65,86,125/- as full and final settlement after 20 months of surveyor assessment.

The arbitral award for Rs.20,65,27,032/- was passed.

The Award is challenged on the grounds – pre-reference interest, double deduction, undervaluation of stock and taxation component.

As per the petitioner, its stock was audited on 31st March, 2017, as per AS-2 (Accounting Standard for Inventories), which valued the stock at cost value or NRV, whichever was lower. The incident of fire at the petitioner‟s premises occurred only twenty five days later, i.e., on 25th April, 2017. Therefore, a 91% crash in valuation, without any evidence, was impermissible.

Thus, the petitioner‟s grievance against finding of Issue No. 4 is that the learned Arbitral Tribunal has disregarded vital evidence, such as, audited stock registers, AS-2 valuation and purchase invoices on record, while rendering the finding.

So far as the Audit Report is concerned, upon which the petitioner has based its challenge to the finding of Issue No. 4, it is to be noted that the purpose of said Report was not specific to or relevant for loss assessment in case of insurance claims. The categorization of stock for the purpose of valuation by the auditor was not as per the date of purchase of particular garment/stock; rather, said categorization was based upon “stock at commencement” and “stock at closing”. Hence, for assessing claim/loss arising out of an insurance policy, the Auditor‟s Report cannot be considered to be a cogent evidence vis-à-vis the Surveyor‟s Report.

 Judgment dated 10.4.2026 of the High Court of Delhi in O.M.P. (COMM) 8/2024 of Panchanan International  Vs   The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I HAVE READ THE DISCLAIMER AND AGREE TO IT.

User Acknowledgement

By proceeding further and clicking on the "AGREE" button herein below, I acknowledge that I of my own accord wish to know more about LegalDeli for my own information and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from LegalDeli or any of its members to create an Attorney-Client relationship through this knowledge site. I further acknowledge having read and understood the Disclaimer below.

Disclaimer
About: This knowledge-site (www.LegalDeli.in) is owned and operated by LegalDeli (“NDA”), and is a resource for your informational and educational purposes only.

No Warranty: NDA does not warrant that any content or information contained on this knowledge-site is accurate, correct, complete or up-to-date, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any actual or threatened loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or otherwise. NDA assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the content and/or information contained on this knowledge-site, nor does it offer any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied in relation to such content or information.

Third-Party Links: NDA does not intend that links / URLs contained on this knowledge-site re-directing users to third party websites be considered as referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with any such third party website operators. NDA is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the content or information contained on such third party websites to which links may be provided on this knowledge-site.

No Legal Advice: By clicking ‘I agree’ and proceeding further, you acknowledge, represent and undertake that you on your own accord wish to know more about NDA, its capabilities and research content and information contained on the knowledge-site, for your own knowledge and personal use. The content and information contained on this knowledge-site should not be construed as nor relied upon as legal advice. You as a reader or recipient of content or information contained in this knowledge-site should not act, nor refrain from acting, based upon any or all of such content or information, but should always seek the advice of competent legal counsel licensed to practice the relevant law in the appropriate jurisdiction.

No Attorney-Client Relationship: This knowledge-site is not intended to be and you should not consider the content or information contained therein to be an advertisement, solicitation, inducement or invitation for an Attorney-Client relationship. Transmission, receipt or use of this knowledge-site, including content and information contained therein, does not constitute nor create an Attorney-Client relationship between NDA and you.